Archive | June, 2022

Boys Club: A Father’s Day Reflection, Dr. Robert Zuber

19 Jun
See the source image
Edvard Munch from Fine Art America

That was when the world wasn’t so big and I could see everywhere. It was when my father was a hero and not a human.   Markus Zusak

No one ever thanked him.  Robert Hayden

Boys are beyond the range of anybody’s sure understanding, at least when they are between the ages of 18 months and 90 years.  James Thurber

I’ve learned a lot about how the male mind works, and as a result I’ve been having nightmares for months.  Yvonne Collins

Boyhood, like measles, is one of those complaints which a man should catch young and have done with, for when it comes in middle life it is apt to be serious.  P.G. Wodehouse

A boy’s will is the wind’s will, And the thoughts of youth are long, long thoughts.  Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

An emphasis on fathering is necessary because of the enormity of its absence.   William Paul Young

He’s still her dad. The rest is just geography.  Jennifer E. Smith

As most of you know, today is Father’s Day, at times replete with awkward moments where, in my family at least, we struggled with perfunctory gift giving to men who had become used to not being thanked for the many subtle and even anonymous things they did for others, men who generally did not offer discernable clues regarding things they might like to have or if the day even had any meaning for them, men  who often ended up picking up the check for an erstwhile “Father’s Day” dinner held at a restaurant they would never have chosen on their own.

As fewer of you may know, today is Juneteenth, a day of marking the effective end of trans-Atlantic slavery, an effective end to men and their families chained inside the hulls of boats making the torturous and often fatal transit across unforgiving seas, the “reward” for survival being sold at auction, separated from loved ones, and now facing an ultimate test of preserving some semblance of the humanity that the brutality of “owners” and the circumstances of enslavement were conspiring  to break down altogether. 

Father’s Day indeed.  Even the simple recognition that those working in the fields were of greater value than the horses and dogs that roamed the property was often more than anyone could expect.  After all, once such value is acknowledged, it becomes morally problematic, even for the most abusive, to see slaves as mere conduits for sexual satisfaction or a bumper crop at market. 

In this precarious time, it would be reasonable, if a bit cheeky, to start drawing lines, the ones that bind ingratitude to grievance, and then to disinformation and then to hate speech, and then to discrimination, and then to outright brutality, sexual violence and even enslavement.   These lines are not tight but neither are they irrelevant.  We reap at least some of what we sow in this life, and much of what we sow now is with inattentive, ungrateful and self-interested hands.  Gratitude, whether to fathers, other family members, or the wider community of interests which sustains our complex lives, remains the first principle in diverting those aforementioned lines towards more productive and dignified sojourns. It is now a principle too-rarely grasped.

But not only now. When I was younger it seemed commonplace to blame mothers for all that was wrong in society, all that was wrong with children who had strayed from whatever path was deemed normative within the family and the wider community.  Having so strayed myself, it was indeed difficult to face a bevy of challenges I was largely unprepared for without casting blame on one or both of the parents to whom I was biologically and culturally tethered.  But there was little doubt in that time that mothers bore the brunt of the liability for who and what their children were to become and that much of that was unfair, in part the consequence of some overly-enthusiastic male psychologists who forgot to remove their own blinders before issuing their pronouncements.

In more recent times, certainly within the policy bubbles which I find myself, while individual males could be honored for their accomplishments, their bravery, even their humanity, the notion of “male” itself has taken a serious hit.  At the UN, the amount of time spent on issues of women’s participation and violence committed against them is quite formidable, not inappropriate at all given levels of abuse perpetrated against far too many women and girls in conflict settings and given the backhanded manner in which the guardians of patriarchy dole out their concessions to women who have in many, many instances outgrown any need or desire for such patronizing largesse.

That said, there is little spoken in UN policy spaces about men and boys, even less that is as thoughtful as it is critical.  For the most part, we don’t have “gendered” policy interests at the UN.  We have women’s interests.  And while the unmet needs of and abuses experienced by men and boys are slowly re-entering the discourse – including surprisingly this week at a good UN event on sexual violence in conflict – we have a long way to go to replace the stereotypes which are now, in my view at least, actually impeding the arrival of a time  when the daughters and sons of fathers can make their way in this wildly unequal world with some hope of finding meaning, purpose and accomplishment during their time on this earth.

It is worth noting here that in the search for quotations for this post, it was necessary to wade through many which were alternately bastions of sentimentality or “clubs” of incrimination, and more of the latter than I might have expected. Indeed, many of the quotations uncovered ostensibly focused on boys were actually offered by young women communicating in one way or another their “nightmares” courtesy of a male mindset which, I suspected at least, they had invested little in understanding beyond how it impacted them.  Let’s be clear. When fatherhood is interpreted through the lens of an absentee and boys are equated with sleep disorders or communicable diseases, whatever pathologies are being cleverly “exposed” are only likely to spread.  After all, most of us of all genders and backgrounds have a hard enough time weaning ourselves from the expectations that others have of us. 

As some of you know, though it is not much in the grand scheme of things, I’ve been funneling money in modest increments for years to organizations accompanying farm workers through their difficult and compromising labors, providing assistance for health and legal access needed to sustain themselves and their families.   I love the painting by Munch adorning this post because, despite current stereotypical limitations, it captures the essence of so many parents I know, so many fathers and mothers who work themselves to the bone in exchange for the affection and respect of their children, conveying an herioc promise to them each day that they will return to the sometimes-dehumanizing fields and factories, even to zones of conflict, to ensure that they have enough, that they are safe enough, that they can navigate the world well enough, that they are loved enough in terms both sentimental and (especially) practical.

Just as I know many boys undeserving of even an analogical whiff of pathology, so I know many fathers who remain resolutely present and active, who strive however they know to keep their promises to their children; to do what they can and guide as they are capable in order to ensure that the “long, long thoughts” of their progeny can lead to dignified and sustainable futures as we pass through these multiply undignified times.  I honor those efforts on their face, but also in the hope that such honoring can lead to a more abundant replication of the best of what I know fathers to be and do.

Lawn Party: Recalling a Movement Still in Motion, Dr. Robert Zuber

13 Jun
Huffington Post

Sorry for the inconvenience. We are trying to change the world. Kate O’Donnell

Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence.  Leonardo da Vinci

The strongest bulwark of authority is uniformity; the least divergence from it is the greatest crime. Emma Goldman

Where you need to be calm, you burst out in rage, and where you need to be on fire, you remain indifferent. Abhijit Naskar

Dedicating your life to understanding yourself can be its own form of protest, especially when the world tells you that you don’t exist. Samra Habib

Kindness, and the commitment to see the other as deserving of human dignity, demands of us to protest, resist, and do all that we can to fight that which says otherwise.  Bruce Reyes-Chow

One of the most important struggles of humanity is to ensure that our ‘fight against hate’ does not become ‘hate’ itself. Adeel Ahmed Khan

Yesterday morning, I dug up my tattered copy of the tepid New York Times coverage of an event that rocked my world at the time but, 40 years later, didn’t rock the planet and its inhabitants in quite the way we who worked and lived through those days might have anticipated.

The event was the so-called million-person march in and around Central Park in New York City, a mass mobilization calling for an end to a nuclear arms race that threatened all life forms and which, or so we hoped, was near a tipping point where sanity might prevail and weapons might be relegated to some scrap heap or other as powerful nations came to their senses and relinquished their nuclear hostage-taking for more positive and collaborative engagements.

Part of the backdrop for this march and its preparations was the Second UN Special Session on Disarmament a follow-up to the SSD1, held four years earlier, which produced mechanisms, largely of dubious effect, to expand and implement the institutionalizing of the UN’s disarmament obligations in accordance with the UN Charter and what was, even then, the clear and demonstrable wishes of many member states.

In hindsight, SSDII more or less threw the million marchers under the bus, leaving it up to the US and (then) USSR to negotiate deeper cuts in nuclear arsenals but not to threaten the pride of place of such weapons in the security postures of the most powerful states.  Despite an almost unprecedented outpouring of public sentiment, it was clear that little would come out of the UN this time to complement that cocophany of voices.  And while there have been notable achievements in the nuclear field since 1982, including the establishment of nuclear weapons free zones and, more recently, a treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons, the states harboring nuclear weapons continue to modernize and (in the case of the DPRK) test them.  40 years on, while the area of influence for nuclear weapons and their possessor states has significantly shrunk, the dangers posed by those weapons have not.

In this time of reflection and commemoration referencing the march on the Great Lawn, I’ve been doing a bit on my own.  I’m grateful for the initiatives by some peace and security-oriented youth groups, including our office mates Reverse the Trend to assess that long-ago time, a march that preceded their entry into this world but the successes and failures of which they have surely (and often anxiously) inherited.  Unlike some of their elders, they have refused to embrace a singular nuclear weapons focus, understanding as we all should that these weapons are not the only existential threat we face as a planet and that a sole focus on such weapons is insufficient to move the international system to an urgent reckoning with discrimination and inequalities, food insecurity and ocean plastics, biodiversity loss and massive weapons flows, severe storms and burning forests,  the result in large part of our commitment to unsustainable lifestyles and addiction-like war preparations.

These youth seem to understand, better than many of the people who marched and chanted and left their footprints all over Central Park, that eliminating nuclear weapons remains essential but also elusive and is in itself insufficient to a world experiencing wolves of many stripes baying at every door and window in the human household, their haunting sounds reminding us that time is limited to spring into action and save ourselves from ourselves.

Reverse the Trend and some of their peers have been doing interviews about June 12, 1982 – what happened, why it happened, who was responsible, that and more.  I spent two years of my life preparing for that march, working alongside other peace groups, trying to manage “ incoming” from pervasive anxieties, moutains of responsibilities and egos off the rails, wondering how such flawed people as we were could possibly lead a movement without its own fatal flaws, wondering as well how we could possibly make the disarmament case to people living in poverty or under oppression, people we neither knew nor referenced, people waiting for an invitation to our Lawn Party which apparently never arrived.

I don’t talk about that event much.  Too much time has passed, time to nudge oneself into a role that was more significant than the one actually occupied, time to romanticize and/or demonize people and processes deserving of neither, time to manufacture and defend meaningful connections between that Lawn Party and the very mixed impacts which have followed in its wake.

I learned much from that time, learned that I had things to discern and contribute, learned that the peace movement and its advocates were not always deserving of the public confidence they sought, learned that cultures of war and violence breed weapons-related threats no matter how many people come out to trample the grass in Central Park, learned that part of the solution to what ails us as a species lies not in our institutions but in the integrity and humanity with which individuals who work in and manage such institutions attend to those structures and their attendant responsibilities.

I also learned how unforgiving much of the work of peace and security can be, how many relationships could not stand up to the pressure of a world under siege, some of which could apparently not survive even a whiff of self-scrutiny.  Indeed, amidst the burnout from many months of unrelenting activities, there was a sense that all of these efforts, all of this forced interaction, was transitory, was not much more than a moment in time when we dared to believe in our collective power of voice before being reminded that the afterglow from this party only lasts so long, only illuminates so much, only captures the heart for a season.

I’m glad this march happened and I’m grateful to those who allowed me to be part of it.  But the skepticism of those days has not entirely abated for me.  I still cannot fully trust ideas of peace put forward by people who are themselves lacking in self-reflection.  I still cannot fully trust ideas of peace put forward by people who see no connection between their lifestyles and their policy aspirations, those who assume that the erstwhile righteousness of their cause accrues virtue to themseleves and their character independent of any character-related insight or effort.

That bar applies to me as well. 

The Party on the Lawn is now a distant memory. The grass in the park has fully recovered. The softball crowd has long ago resumed their competitions. The party crowd still with us has dispersed in directions hard to detect, some to new structures of nuclear weapons advocacy, some to work in other and (we hope) complementary issue sectors, others in retreat to a now-familiar world of increasing anxieties and logitstical demands. We all did a good thing 40 years ago, but it was not without its flaws both methodological and personal. The younger ones are now trying to figure out where they stand in relation to what we did and didn’t do. We need to be honest with them and with ourselves. Their party is only getting started.