Class Act: Transition Time for Some Special Council Members, Dr. Robert Zuber

27 Dec
Mural in United Nations Security Council

Security Council Chamber Mural from Norway

What Modest Dreamers We Have Become.  Zadie Smith

Don’t spend time beating on a wall, hoping to transform it into a door.   Coco Chanel

I want you to listen to what your conscience commands you to do and go on to carry it out to the best of your knowledge. Viktor E. Frankl

It had long since come to my attention that people of accomplishment rarely sat back and let things happen to them. They went out and happened to things.  Leonardo da Vinci

Judge your success by what you had to give up in order to get it.  Dalai Lama XIV

Our greatest fear should not be of failure but of succeeding at things in life that don’t really matter.  Francis Chan

Accepting oneself does not preclude an attempt to become better.  Flannery O’Connor

It is common to this specific weekly resource that, while its origins are squarely within the framework of multilateral policy engagement in general and the UN in particular, posts about the UN are always among the least read of all our contributions.

Some of this resistance is understandable.  The UN has issued many resolutions, made many promises, that are candidates for “effort” awards more than achievement awards.  We “try” our best to mobilize governments on climate change, but global temperatures have actually risen since the signing of the Paris accords.  We “try” to get governments to honor their groundbreaking commitments to the sustainable development goals, but a combination of spreading COVID-19 infections and lukewarm intent to change what needs to be changed — and not just what we are “willing” to change — has set some of goals and targets back in ways we might not have anticipated. And on COVID itself, we are almost a year into a pandemic that has killed people on a scale that is generally reserved for our World Wars, a staggering total despite daily briefings and admonitions from UN agencies to better align our behavior on infections and vaccines with existing risks.

And this recitation does not even count the UN’s attempts to promote democracy and human rights in a world increasing seduced by authoritarians and their ethno-centric lenses, nor by the conflicts that continue to rage, year after year, resolution after resolution, tarnishing the Security Council’s reputation and creating humanitarian emergencies from Myanmar to Cameroon which drain massive amounts of member state resources and push the formidable skills and bravery of UN humanitarian personnel (and their NGO counterparts) to the breaking point.

Despite its many tentative-only successes and resolutions more ignored than embraced, the Security Council remains the focus of a UN system still struggling to convince its own members to abide by the values and obligations which underpin membership.   Council meetings and press briefings deliver routinely higher levels of press and NGO interest.  Council failures and successes are more likely to make front-page news than anything else that the UN does or tries to do (at least until the current pandemic exploded on to the scene). Council reform –whether related to its member-state composition or the use of the veto by its permanent five members – is always a “hot” topic among the general UN membership, most of whom feel, not without reason, that the Council represents the dynamics of a world long-gone and is simply no longer representative of current geo-political realities let alone of the security needs and interests of UN states.

And yet, despite disconnects within the Council itself and with the general membership, despite a legacy of half-successes which impacts virtually every aspect of the UN’s work –personnel and states largely without a voice regarding how the Council does its business — states frequently do not hesitant to campaign for an elected, two-year Council tenure.  Part of the motivation for this is clearly tied to national prestige and the right to chime in on security policy on a regular basis (either as individual states or as part of a group such as the African (A3+1), the “1” for this cycle being St. Vincent and the Grenadines).  But it is also a lot of work, especially in chairing “subsidiary organs” and especially for small missions such as the soon-to-depart Dominican Republic which managed to “punch well above its weight” but still had to work much-too hard to keep up with the other, larger members of their “class,” let alone with the likes of the US, China and Russia.

Complicating matters is the fact that the Council itself is currently lacking leadership commensurate with its lofty status. This is not a high-water mark for representation from the Permanent Five members, a situation which has created openings for elected members, especially so for the five members of this current, soon-to-depart class.  But it also has exacerbated tensions as elected members attempted to steer the Council into more productive if not calmer waters, to help move the world (as the Council chamber mural suggests we should) from greater conflict to a greater peace. In this class, Germany was the core provocateur, publicly chiding (mostly) Russia and China for ignoring the human rights dimensions of conflict and for enabling rights abuses on a virtually unprecedented scale in places like Syria.  However, the fact that Germany was perceived as stepping beyond protocol while largely ignoring abuses by other permanent and elected members was not lost on the Chinese whose final retort to the German Ambassador upon completion of his tenure was “good riddance,” a phrase which the Chinese might want to hold at the ready as a new group of feisty (we hope) elected members joins the Council on January 1:  India, Ireland, Kenya, Mexico and Norway.

This incoming group might do well to study the class they are replacing which, to my view at least, ticked off the boxes that make elected members key to Council effectiveness and, we can only hope, eventual Council reform.  Of these boxes, a couple stand out: First, elected members must be willing to expose willful limitations in the Council’s ability to fully grasp and address the manifold causes and implications of global conflict.  From Belgium’s extraordinary advocacy for children’s rights and welfare and Germany’s insistence on climate change and gender dimensions in all conflict analysis, to Indonesia’s constant reminder that the Council’s job is ultimately to “save lives” and that “neighbors know best” how to achieve peace in local and regional contexts, this group was not shy about the “thematic obligations” which can broaden and enliven the traditional security formulations which have defined the Council “bubble” for far too long. Add to this South Africa’s leadership on strengthening (and properly funding) African peace operations and the compassionate but insistent interventions by the Dominican Republic, including on the security challenges of Caribbean and other small island states, and this class was clearly prepared to expand security dynamics to embrace all that we need to address and not simply those that the permanent Council members are willing to address.

In addition, this class perhaps as much as any others, clearly understood its responsibility to the rest of the UN membership, indeed to the global community, to ensure that a range of current security threats remain in focus.  This group understands as well that its individual and collective responsibility for peace and security does not end when this calendar year does, but can be engaged in other multilateral forums, including the UN’s own General Assembly and Peacebuilding Commission. And by working with the new class of elected members as well as the class which rolls over into 2021, they can help keep pressure on the Council to end its sometimes petty bickering cloaked in national interest and demand successes in areas that really matter, especially areas of conflict prevention and resolution that can spare the people of this planet famine and displacement, trafficking and discrimination in multiple forms.

One of the fears coming out of the current pandemic and accompanying global insecurity is that we have collectively become “modest dreamers,” content to slog along in our own lives and excuse our institutions for doing likewise.  We have willingly lowered our own sights and simultaneously lowered the bar for places, like the UN Security Council, for which “success” is now too-often measured in small, tepid increments rather than in grander insistences.  For those who still care about such matters, and I think we all should, thanks must be extended to this outgoing class of elected Council members for reminding us that our bar for peace must always be set high, that the pandemic is not an excuse for failing to make and keep promises that matter to the world, that the Council can and must set a better example for others rather than wallowing, session after session, issue after issue, in the self-generated muck of its own politicized limitations, and that the values of the UN Charter are for the permanent members to aspire to as well — to improve their own performance — and not merely to serve as one more threat to hold over the heads of other states.

I didn’t always agree with the priorities and statements of this class of elected members.  But they were on the right track most of the time and, more than that, they cared about what the Council was doing and why, the messages that were being sent out from this chamber to those millions of women, men and children whose lives has been ravaged by the conflicts the Council was unable or unwilling to stop.  This was a group that wanted to “happen to things,” happen through their thoughtful clarifications but also through their willingness to make the necessary sacrifices, open every accessible door, and use all the tools in the toolbox – not only the coercive or threatening ones – to ensure both the well-being of global constituents and a UN community more compliant with the values which bound the community together in the first place.

We urge the new class of elected members to take up their responsibilities with that same sense of determination, to help prevent conflict whenever humanly possible but also to restore the full functionality of Council processes and insist on successes that are worthy of what might be still – and must become again – the world’s single most important chamber. 

And to those of you who care enough about the UN and its role in global security to wade through this post, our heartfelt gratitude is extended to you with best wishes for a healthier and more peaceful new year.

Tags: , , ,

Rays of Promise: Post-Pandemic Goals Worth Winning, Dr. Robert Zuber

20 Dec
See the source image

People will do anything, no matter how absurd, in order to avoid facing their own souls. One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious. Carl Jung

One need not be a chamber to be haunted.  Emily Dickinson

I wonder if that’s how darkness wins, by convincing us to trap it inside ourselves, instead of emptying it out.  Jasmine Warga

Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light. John Milton

They gave it up before they ever really even got started. J.D. Salinger

I am terrified by this dark thing that sleeps in me; all day I feel its soft, feathery turnings, its malignity.  Sylvia Plath

I need more of the night before I open eyes and heart to illumination. Denise Levertov

I’m writing this morning on the darkest day of the year in the northern hemisphere and from a city currently with the highest number of COVID infections in a state with the highest number of COVID infections in a country with the highest number of COVID infections.  Chants in the US of “we’re number 1” have never seemed as shallow to me as they do at this particular moment, a time which continues to put extraordinary strains on those few for whom caregiving is a vocation not circumscribed by what seem to be the ever-shrinking circles of concern of so many of the rest of us.

The media is chock-full of disturbing health-related and political messaging of late, pitched alongside the hope that the miraculously rapid development of COVID vaccines will stem the current tide of death and misery early in the New Year.  Will we in the north survive this infection-saturated winter? If so, will we be able to recover our human touch or will we remain secluded our smallish worlds, defined more and more by computer screens and video distractions? Moreover, will we make good on pledges for equitable access to vaccines for the entire global community?  It would seem to be almost a miracle of another sort if we could collectively walk back the fear and self-preoccupations which have defined us through much of 2020 and affirm – through policy and practice – this global responsibility (thankfully reinforced in large measure by UN agencies) to ensure global access to vaccines which offer hope, in the short-term at least, that we can dodge full-scale damage from this plague and, once again, manage to save ourselves from ourselves.

However, many social and media commentators now recognize publicly what many of us have feared privately – that the dysfunctional personal and political traits which have accelerated in this plague year – not birthed this year – will be hard for us to shake.  We have had another long year to justify turning our backs on each other, creating enemies from conspiracies, transforming climate denialism into an art form, holding fast to beliefs about the “myth” of COVID in some instances to our last dying breaths.  The vaccines will, if all goes well, keep the pandemic in check, but they will have no direct impact on the creeping “malignity” of our spirits, darkness which we have chosen to bury inside of ourselves and which is unlikely to be dispelled either by medical breakthroughs or by the sunlight now poised to oh-so-slowly return to our northern skies.

And, sad to say, we are getting scant assistance in confessing and overcoming our darkness from our institutions of governance, which often seem trapped in their own bubbles of self-importance and self-interest.  The US is only one of what seem to be a growing number of states seduced by authoritarians and their sycophants who seem to believe that holding power is about taking advantage of opportunity rather than serving the public interest.  And in so doing, such “leaders” are reinforcing for their publics values based on a nefarious “creed” described recently by Anne Applebaum: “Everyone is corrupt, everyone is on the take.” We’re living in a world without morals or principles and “all that matters is whether or not you win.”  Such a cynical, transactional view of the world has certainly taken root in the US, and those roots are now deeper and broader than some of us are willing to admit.

Thankfully, we know that corrupt practices and winning at all costs does not define us entirely, even in this plague year. Our own social media is inundated each week with incredible acts of courage and kindness that offer hope to our present and help ensure a post-pandemic quality of life for future generations.  From tree planting in the Sahel to emptying prisons of the politically incarcerated and tortured, initiatives are underway in so many global settings to stem the current tide of normative decay and blatant cruelty. In this the UN is doing its part beyond rigorously promoting the “global public good” of vaccines.  This week alone we witnessed some good movement towards a global moratorium on the use of the death penalty, some enthusiastic support for political and peace progress in countries such as Afghanistan and Sudan, and a couple of compelling events focused on the need for human rights-based approaches to counter-terror operations and more robust institutions of accountability for those who commit mass atrocity crimes.

But like the many countries at present whose social fabrics are fraying at the edges, the UN has also been subject to increasingly stubborn postures and nasty exchanges that seem a bit startling in an institution that generally reinforces diplomatic politeness (with occasional touches of passive-aggression.)  In the Economic and Social Council, diplomats hurled vague accusations, including at ECOSOC’s current president (Pakistan), over the fate of a still-unendorsed Political Declaration that is badly needed to help galvanize state support for the UN’s Decade of Acton on sustainable development. And in the Security Council, its often-ugly and rarely-impactful discussions on Syria’s long decade of violent abuses flared up even further this week, punctuated by China’s assertion that Germany’s soon-to-be-concluded humanitarian leadership on Syria and its overall Council tenure have been a “failure.”  

We don’t share China’s judgment in this, but we are mindful of what these exchanges represent – signs of further fraying of our standards of propriety and mutual responsibility.  States are now dabbling in what too many of us in our personal realms are doing as well – shutting the metaphorical doors and windows to divergent viewpoints and basking instead in the echo chambers of our self-selected, self-interested versions of “reality.” Whether in Washington, Brasilia, Moscow, Damascus or any number of other capital settings, our leadership is increasingly acting out a cynical script, less about inspiring people to be their better selves and more about keeping our darkness locked within where it can best “haunt” personal and collective potential.

Given this pervasive dearth of inspiration by much of our political leadership, the way out of our darkness, out of the hell that we have relentlessly manufactured for ourselves, will likely be long and hard.  And the near-miraculous vaccines now becoming available to those most vulnerable to infection will not by themselves bring the illumination that we so long for in this season.  But they might eventually help give our species one more chance – a chance to end corrupt practices in governance, increase responsiveness by our international institutions, guarantee better health and educational access, and make our political systems of checks and balances more reliable, our judicial systems better able to ensure accountability for the worst of human crimes, and our economics more equitable and eco-responsive.

Given where we now find ourselves and despite a bevy of pandemic-related disruptions and uncertainties, if winning is indeed, “everything” then surely this is the “winning” to which we should aspire. This is the “illumination” which we should now be preparing to welcome, illumination which can effectively dispel darkness to which we have become both conscious and committed to push out from our most remote inner spaces.  Indeed, if we are to reset our pandemic-infected, darkness-infused present, it will take more than governments, more than global institutions, certainly more than vaccines.  It will, as Jung noted, take more of us with the courage to “face our own souls,” to confess our dark spaces and then persevere to the brink of our capacities in illuminating and incarnating opportunities to make our world greener and less violent, opportunities that might just represent our last, best chance for life.

This evening in the northern sky, a rare convergence of planets will lead to the sighting of the “star of Bethlehem,” a “star” that was believed to settle over the manger where the baby Jesus lay many centuries ago, a mysterious star illuminating a sacred promise. This year’s version of manger season offers its own inspiration and guidance on how the promises that define our own time might best be implemented and sustained, how our current darkness might have its power over our values, priorities and actions finally and fully dispelled.  We would do well to urgently discern its message.

Tags: , , ,

A Call for Devotion in Treacherous Times, Dr. Robert Zuber

13 Dec
See the source image

The desire to reach for the stars is ambitious. The desire to reach hearts is wise.  Maya Angelou

Live for each second without hesitation.  Elton John

True progress is to know more, and be more, and to do more.  Oscar Wilde

It doesn’t matter how great your shoes are if you don’t accomplish anything in them.  Martina Boone

We must do extraordinary things. We have to. Dave Eggers

They can’t see the distant shore anymore, and they wonder if their paddling is moving them forward. None of the trees behind them are getting smaller and none of the trees ahead are getting bigger. Donald Miller

Something – the eternal ‘what’s the use?’ – sets its bronze barrier across every avenue that I open up in the realm of hypothesis.  Gustave Flaubert

In this time of multiple crises affecting all corners of our planet, the UN finds itself in a place both pivotal and peculiar.  Despite restrictions due to a stubborn pandemic and resulting financial constraints, the UN has maintained its pivotal convening function, holding the attentions of states on issues (and the mix of stakeholders) that might otherwise slide further down the list of national priorities.  

Over the past several days, including a rare Saturday convening, UN officials and agencies converged around issues ranging from famine in Yemen and ensuring accountability for ISIL abuses committed in Iraq to the link between stemming illicit financial flows and silencing the guns across Africa, and a formal honoring of those often-beleaguered frontline health workers who help ensure our right to health care during a pandemic while putting their own right to life in daily jeopardy. 

Added to this was the main Saturday event, an assessment of our ambitions for achieving the Paris Climate goals five years after passage.  In several ways, the event was a let down, filled with statements and accompanying images of the climate emergency about which we really do not need a reminder, images offered with scant explanation of how some legitimately hopeful initiatives on renewable energy, reforestation, biodiversity protection and more will quickly add up to a successfully decarbonized planet. 

Indeed, in assessing the impact of this “Climate Ambition Summit,” the president of next November’s 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) in Glasgow, Scotland publicly lamented that while Saturday’s event resulted in some innovative climate commitments, we are also forced to face up to the fact that “this is not enough.”  We need higher levels of ambition, much higher in fact, to resist the coming wave of “climate catastrophe.”

Indeed we do.  But where is the “higher” going to come from?   How can we encourage more “urgency in action” with regard to climate and famine, conflict prevention and inclusive political participation? How do we compel more of this urgency and then link it, arm in arm, in a timely and effective manner?   What are the missing ingredients in our approaches?  What obstacles do we continue to place in our own way?

Part of the problem for us at the UN is related to the way in which we do our business and how the pandemic has, in some ways, reinforced some already dubious habits.   Having worked out some of the kinks in earlier iterations of our digital policymaking, we are now literally inundated with virtual policy events.  These are relatively easy to organize, carbon-friendly and allow diplomats to come away believing that something tangible has happened for the world while we non-diplomats imagine that we actually have some role in global governance and its functional priorities complements of zoom and other platforms. 

These digital events are certainly helpful to the organizers insofar as it allows them to “brand” their work and solicit funding based on the assumption that these events actually “make a difference.”  But do they really?  Do they actually get us closer to a world that is defined less by catastrophe and violence and more by inclusion, abundance and stability?  And if so, how does that happen?   And for whom does that happen?  

Recent events don’t allow for excessive optimism regarding impact.   In the case of the Climate Ambition Summit, we got what we are now accustomed to getting in our currently digitalize policy spaces – prerecorded (or pre-fabricated) messages by “global leaders” attempting to put their best feet forward, telling us what they want us to hear through presentation content that, for the most part, falls far short of what is needed if we are truly to avert climate catastrophe.  Such statements are generally measured, even formalistic, short on assessment of national policy measures and even shorter on inspiration.  The leaders represented at the Summit were speaking, not listening,  sharing what they are doing and what they plan to do — some of which is quite good –but mostly failing to reference the multiple levels at which change must occur and be enabled, especially those manifold initiatives at local level which remain key to habitat restoration, sustainable agriculture and a host of other planet-restoring measures.

There was also at this Summit a bit what has become ubiquitous gushing over “civil society participation” with some innovative and hopeful interventions from that sector, including several compelling short videos courtesy of the World Wildlife Fund.  In another part of the program, the voices of young people could be heard, voices of frustration due to their largely unheeded calls for robust and urgent climate action, for meaningful paths to policy participation, for taking with proper seriousness the warnings of science and then adopting measures that are not confined by the conveniences of bureaucracies or government agencies.

The pre-recorded statements by global leaders made no mention of this frustration.  They didn’t hear it.  And even if they had, there would likely be little penance forthcoming for the wasted opportunity of Paris, that moment five years ago when what we did in the Paris aftermath might have mattered more than it has, that time when we could have prevented more of the fires from raging, the ice from melting, the species from going extinct, the droughts and floods from spreading out their carnage, the ocean storms from achieving ever-higher categories of energy and destruction.  We could have done this, we should have done this, but we didn’t listen to the children.  Our commitment to their collective future has, to date at least, proven shamefully deficient.

Perhaps ironically, far from our centers of policy influence, there was another call to movement on Saturday, a movement typically involving many thousands of persons by vehicle or on foot (even on their knees) whose lives are often directly impacted by climate change and armed violence, by corrupt practices in institutions large and small, sacred and secular.

On this Saturday was the Feast of Guadalupe, a time in past years for people across Mexico and beyond to practice their devotion to their blessed Mary, but also to share in that devotion energy with the many who gather at the Basilica in Mexico City and the many more who have drunk from this energizing reservoir of faith and commitment in years past.

I have seen this devotion first hand, enough to probe a few of its virtues and shortcomings, enough to see the looks on the faces of pilgrims who could not survive, would not wish to survive, without the sustaining energy that comes from a commitment deeper and more consuming than most of us could hardly imagine beyond the domain of our children and other close family members.

It is sad that this devotional energy, like so much else this year, has moved online due to the pandemic, a digital setting which cannot possibly convey the depth of devotion displayed by people from all walks of life, many of whom likely do not have digital access and wouldn’t accept the substitute if they had.  But there is a lesson still looming here for the rest of us, a lesson about the limitations of our bureaucratized discourse, about our inadvertently patronizing attitudes towards local initiatives and actors, about our tone-deafness towards the very stakeholders we routinely seek to bring into our midst.

When it comes to climate change or other global challenges, the need for urgent action is fully apparent as are some hopeful technologies and other initiatives developed to give us a puncher’s chance to shift course in a sustainable direction, to overcome the “bronze barrier” of our “what’s the use” cynicism that pervades too many persons and sectors, even in our churches and government agencies.  Still our current trajectory remains simply insufficient to the health and healing of the planet or of ourselves, and we should promptly cease defending levels of policy progress or personal dedication that appear unlikely to bend that curve.  

In this time of events running apace of outcomes, it would actually be helpful to hear a few honest expressions of remorse from our leadership, penance for opportunities missed that may not come our way again, expressions of devotion – real devotion – for our planet and its diverse inhabitants. It’s not good politics, I suppose, but If we are to convince the audiences that must be convinced – including the youth in climate vulnerable states, and the small-holder farmers, drivers and shop-keepers walking that long road to Guadalupe — we need to demonstrate our capacity to reach their hearts and not only their “interests,” to “wear” at least some of the devotion which they know full well is essential to getting us over the hump regarding responses to threats that we have merely dabbled in for far too long.

Metaphorically speaking, we’re actually now wearing the right shoes, but its long past time to do important things in them and to do those things without hesitation, without excessive weight from protocols and bureaucracies, without the excuses that stand in the way of learning, doing and being more than we now are. If our incessant policy “paddling” is ever to get us close to safer and saner shores, the craft we paddle must be fueled in greater portion by devotion, that energy which communicates to people everywhere and in all circumstances that their current and future lives, their current and future well-being, are genuinely worth paddling for.

Tags: , , ,

Normal Range: Honoring a World of Difference, Dr. Robert Zuber

6 Dec
Image

If you are different from the rest of the flock, they bite you.  Vincent O’Sullivan

Everyone’s on the cliff edge of normal. Holly Bourne

In a society so governed by superficiality, appearances, and petty economics, dreams are more real than anything in the “real world.” Dominic Owen Mallary

Everything was perfectly healthy and normal here in Denial Land.  Jim Butcher

I claim to crave a bit of normalcy but now that I have some, it’s like I don’t know what to do with it. Gayle Forman

The normal world has no room for exceptions and always quietly eliminates foreign objects. Sayaka Murata

Though they may not (yet) have influenced your own life in ways that are tangible to you, the UN managed a quite remarkable week, albeit mostly in virtual formats, holding events on issues from aviation security and Africa security sector reform to transforming rural food systems and addressing the distinctive aspirations and circumstances of people of African descent.

Amidst this cacophony of policy deliberations and interests, two significant events grabbed headlines while another didn’t generate the interest it should have.  On Wednesday, the UN Secretary-General presented his “State of the Planet” address (at Columbia University) in which he detailed our “assault on nature” which continues largely unabated into the present, an assault that requires an environmental equivalent to “silencing the guns.” The SG passionately reminded us of the many “suicidal” climate impacts that we have done too-little to mitigate and which threaten us with both political instability and biological collapse. As he so often does, he ended his “world on fire” remarks by reminding us that we now have the skills and technology needed to right this ship, but both now require the most urgent application.

One of those aforementioned (what Peru referred to as “slow motion”) climate impact is directed related to human health, specifically the frequency of deadly pandemics or which COVID-19 could eventually prove to be merely a warm-up.  Thus, it was with great anticipation that we greeted this week’s General Assembly special session on COVID-19 response which focused on ensuring that approved vaccines are understood by states and stakeholders as a “global public good.” The other priority (with leadership from Latvia) was on reversing course with regard to the current “Infodemic,” the preponderance of misinformation and disinformation – some perversely intentional – which has complicated vaccine rollout and disappointed the researchers who spoke to the GA in humble (and sometimes frustrated) tones about their aspirations for the vaccines they helped develop, test and authorize for use at a remarkable, unprecedented pace.

These two were the highest of a series of high impact events, and rightfully so.  Both climate change and the current pandemic (and their overlapping “Infodemics”) are creating havoc in communities urban and rural, jeopardizing both our food security and our mental health, making life uncomfortable for the most privileged and literally unthinkable for the least privileged with more sliding into the latter category each and every day.

Such was the context for the annual meeting of the treaty body on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities that we look forward to every year, a time when the hallways of the UN are usually filled with people who are “disabled” in mostly physical ways but who have often struggled mightily and successfully in an attempt to overcome for themselves and others what are generally recognized as the primary barriers associated with disability – activity limitations and participation restrictions. 

The pandemic spread made it impossible to gather on site as we are often honored to do, to be in the presence of persons who come to the UN with their walking sticks and wheelchairs, with their hearing assistance and seeing-eye dogs to make the case that their “normal” is as entitled to rights, respect and recognition as that of any of the rest of us; that participation in social and political life is not a privilege to be bestowed but a right to be recognized; that the “soft bigotry” that Australia highlighted this week is related not only to the codification of a more conventional “normal,” but also to an arrogant ascription of low expectations for persons who can’t “do what we do” as though they might not also be able “to do what we can’t.” 

These misplaced codifications and expectations exacerbate struggles within communities of disability, mighty ones in fact.  Persons with physical disabilities must navigate a world designed largely to reinforce the comforts and conveniences of the conventionally abled, and we have heard story after agonizing story over many years as their largely inaccessible homes and communities makes timely relocation from bombing and flooding, from famine and insurgencies, particularly treacherous for both themselves and those accompanying them.  Moreover, especially in this time of pandemic, we recognize that “disability” in many global regions is taking some precarious and unwelcome turns towards higher levels of poverty, epidemics of narcotics dependency and mental illness, and other factors making it harder and harder to thrive amidst a host of still-potent accessibility and participation-challenged contexts.

This “soft bigotry” takes other forms, from our increasing reliance on the “normal” within our families and other social bubbles to the functional denial of the rights and skills of those billion + persons in our world who struggle to find their way within societies which seem to be designed and crafted around the abilities they don’t have and not the ones they do have.  

Some of this seems not so “soft.” The tendency to shrink “room for exceptions,” or even to insist that others hold their places on a “cliffs edge” of our own sense of what is normal, is sadly not unusual throughout our life cycles.  Parents of young children can experience high and sometimes even competitive levels of anxiety as they assess whether their children are following a “normal” development path.   Older children can certainly be prone to “biting” or otherwise intimidating classmates who for one reason or another fail to conform to “normal” social expectations, especially those of the “cool kids.”  Later in life, those sufficiently privileged can create domiciled havens in communities which virtually guarantee that the only people seen and heard on a regular basis are those who look and act “like us.”

While some of this is understandable, especially regarding the development of young children, the general pattern here is conducive to another sort of “Infodemic” – the (mis) communication that what is different is to be deemed alien or even threatening until proven otherwise, such “proof” being hard to come by.  In this time of pandemic and economic uncertainty the tendency to roll up the metaphorical rug of our lives; to restrict the circle of concern to a more “manageable” size; to let others worry about the access, participation and other rights of persons with whom we are rarely in contact; to restrict our experiences in the real world and then allow others to fill in reality gaps with conspiracies and other “information” designed to push people further into dens of grievance and retreat; all if this creates an unwelcome context for difference, including of ability/disability, one that reflects yet another, albeit largely unseen, barrier to rights and respect.

The irony here is that, as the pandemic and its economic consequences spread and deepen, as the impacts of a warming climate accelerate displacement and exacerbate insecurity and political tensions, the numbers of the “not normal,” the people who now find it harder and harder to cope in societies which seem habitually distracted at best and hostile to their needs and interests at worst, these numbers are certain to grow.  And as those who gathered around a largely virtual UN this week to assess the treaty guaranteeing the rights of persons with disabilities recognize, our responsibility is only deepening to ensure that those growing numbers of persons in all their aspects and circumstances, with all their levels and types of ability, are not also forced to cope with life challenges in some lonely, inaccessible, insecure isolation.  

Whether we like to admit it or not, we live in a world of “exceptions” beyond range of our ascriptions of normalcy, people whose diverse talents and abilities, whose broad and even uncommunicated aspirations and longings, are still not in sufficient balance with our “normal,” our taken-for-granted, than our fragile social, security and environmental networks can likely tolerate.  We need to honor these billion + life forces better than we do at present, to watch and listen to them, to consider more of what they have to teach the rest of us, even if they don’t realize they’re teaching! Moreover, we would do well to regain some of our misplaced sensitivity to the access and participation needs of others, protecting them as jealously as we guard our own. And we need to do this as though our lives depend on it.

More than many recognize, they do.

Tags: , ,

Lonely Exile: An Advent Reflection, Dr. Robert Zuber

29 Nov
Feeling lonely? You've got company. | The World from PRX

The loneliest moment in someone’s life is when they are watching their whole world fall apart, and all they can do is stare blankly.  F. Scott Fitzgerald

Every grievance you hold hides a little more of the light of the world from your eyes until the darkness becomes overwhelming. Donna Goddard

So many people are shut up tight inside themselves like boxes, yet they would open up, unfolding quite wonderfully, if only you were interested in them. Sylvia Plath

Of all the hardships a person had to face, none was more punishing than the simple act of waiting. Khaled Hossein

They’d elevate small grievances; they’d cherish hurt feelings and ill treatment like they were signs of virtue. Amy Bloom

As we have said about many things in this strange and uncomfortable year, this Advent season feels like few we have experienced in our collective lifetime.

One of the reasons, I suspect, why Advent is not more resonant within communities and even across faith traditions is that we don’t routinely engage in the reflections and reactions that the season demands. The word “Advent” is perhaps best translated as “expectation.” The signature image is, as we have noted over many years, the lone person peering into the night sky, knowing that something is out there that can reverse the trend of lonely exile, that can provide a lift to relationships in disarray and the loosening of the iron grip of occupation both of our nations and our souls.

This peering into the Milky Way was never merely wishful thinking, for Isiah and other prophets had long-anticipated “a light to those who sit in darkness” indeed even to those who find themselves sitting “in the shadow of death.” And yet this expectation was accompanied neither by a timeline nor a script. Something out there would surely come, a visitation would commence that could “guide our feet into the way of peace,” peace in our families, our communities, our world, but the timing and the program elements were as yet unclear, as yet uncertain. And the wait for clarity was genuinely painful as “the simple act of waiting” so often is.

But longing and waiting for a visitation are insufficient. This “way of peace” demands more of us as well. The visitation that can “guide our feet” requires us to use those feet to walk that path, to trust the direction but do so willfully and mindfully, to push ourselves forward and not wait for some unseen hand to keep pushing from behind. And as we walk, to engage in the two demands that, for me at least, signify the essence of the Advent season, the essence of our longing and response.

For me, the core of Advent takes the forms of Anticipation and Preparation: anticipation of the world made possible in part through the promise of a visitation; preparation to seize that opportunity, to be as ready as we can be as that world of promise takes its welcome shape.

On the surface, these two attributes seem like obvious conduits for the best of our modern age; indeed in healthy families, institutions or even governments, both play a key role. Such health requires an attentive and active investment in the world and its peoples, a willingness to see past our often-petty, soul-clogging grievances and our sometimes discouraging logistics to a time when, as the Anglican Book of Common Prayer puts it, we have “cast away the works of darkness” and now bathe in a light which is accessible to all and not just to some, a light which never dims in part because we ourselves have accepted the responsibility for illumination.

But all this sounds now like a bit fantasy, doesn’t it? Those in our time who dare to anticipate at all often see a future filled with obstacles for which we are no more prepared than we were for prior sets of challenges. We “expect” the next major storms to devastate coastlines, the next geo-political tensions to spill over into brutal conflict, the next species to be made extinct through our own greed and negligence, the next pandemics lying in wait to inflict their damage once the current virus has had its fill of us.

On and on, anticipating an epoch of impediments for which we do not know how to adequately prepare, indeed that our elected representatives and policymakers don’t seem properly equipped to address either. Rather than anticipating that time when our feet finally reach that place of light and peace, that time when anticipated visitation becomes trusted presence, we expect to see only the faintest glimmers of a world that seems perpetually beyond our reach. Indeed, especially in this pandemic year, it seems to many as though our sun is always setting, regardless of the hour.

But Advent calls out circumstances not in perpetual dusk — calls us to anticipate and prepare for the world that can and must exist beyond the loneliness that has disabled so many of our current connections, beyond the (non-virtuous) grievances that rob the world of light and disfigure our very souls, beyond the masks and social distancing which are necessary for physical health but challenging to emotional stability. We fear the dusk and the darkness which soon envelops it, but we fail to properly discern what such fear reveals about the status of our own resilience, our own courage to stay the course of peace, our own capacity to illuminate a path different from the one we are on now, a path inconsistent with Advent’s calling.

In writing this, my thoughts turned to a deceased Aunt who helped raise me but whose later years were a veritable cauldron of suspicion and grievance, immersed in conspiracy theories and half-truths she never bothered to interrogate. She was one of those people who when the phone or doorbell rang, would erupt in expletive-saturated discourse as though the voice on the other end had no goal other than to take her money or make her life more confusing and threatening than it already seemed.

With all due regard for the prevalence of elder abuse, I used to think that my Aunt was a relatively extreme, isolated case. But in this era of pandemic, climate and economic threats, when even a jaunt to the market has potentially grave health and budgetary implications, the numbers of socially isolated persons are vast approaching epidemic proportions. Indeed, one explanation for the failure of political polling to make accurate forecasts in the US election just concluded is the large number of people who now simply refuse to answer the phone or whose grievance-laden and conspiratorial responses made pollsters wish they hadn’t bothered.

Most of us are not as angry and self-protective as this, of course, but many of us seem unable to see past the current circumstances to that time when it is no longer necessary or appropriate to see others primarily as viral conduits or threats to our increasingly privatized spaces, but rather as fellow beings who need our touch, our encouragement, our tangible expressions of interest. It is thus cause for concern, especially apparent during this season of anticipation, that our heart-habits are still tracking in dubious directions, that the visitation of Advent finds so many of us in hardened, isolated, impatient, even desolate places.

As circumstances better enable, it will be instructive to see if and how we are able to pivot to a world where solidarity makes more sense than competition; where vulnerability makes more sense than isolation; where sharing makes more sense than hoarding; where showing interest in others makes more sense than demanding attention; where gratitude makes more sense than grievance; where our aching feet carry on the path towards that revelatory state wherein the world remains illuminated and lasting peace remains within our grasp.

This Advent more than others, such instruction still indicates a risk of of slipping deeper into “lonely exile,” a place of disconnect from ourselves but also from those who can bring richness to our lives, including those who can inspire visions of a better world and help enable the multiple preparations we must now be about in order to to get there. Thankfully this Advent can also serve as a reminder of what months of isolation, social distancing and face coverings have tended to obscure, that the keys to our recovery from this pandemic are also keys to our recovery as a species.

The blank stares which define so much our battered present must not be allowed any longer to blur anticipation of a healthier, fairer, saner planet. Something is coming to help push us down a path towards a world that is no longer falling apart, that is no longer shedding species and hope, that is no longer enveloped in a fog of virus, mistrust and indifference. Advent is our time time to prepare for that visit, for that push, and for that world.

Tags: , , ,

Attitude Adjustment: A Thanksgiving Reflection, Dr. Robert Zuber

22 Nov
Manage Risk to Stay Safe for COVID Thanksgiving

Walk as if you are kissing the Earth with your feet.  Thich Nhat Hanh

Let gratitude be the pillow upon which you kneel to say your nightly prayer. Maya Angelou

Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well.  Voltaire

It is a pity that doing one’s best does not always answer.  Charlotte Brontë

This last night we tear into each other, as if to wound, as if to find the key to everything before morning.  Michael Ondaatje

Success sometimes may be defined as a disaster put on hold.  Nadine Gordimer

The Major was silent. He was at once appalled and also reluctant to hear any more. This was why people usually talked about the weather. Helen Simonson

During this past week of political turmoil within and beyond the US, together with a pandemic that is spreading in some regions faster than butter on a hot biscuit, a singular image shook me to my core.

The image was of a boy in Cameroon, a country I have visited several times and which has been in the throes of civil conflict for too-many years now as the Anglophone region bordering Nigeria struggles to maintain autonomy from an increasingly tone-deaf and even brutal government in Yaounde.  

And while I’m skeptical of many posted images on twitter and other social media, this is one which could not have been photo-shopped, could not have its takeaways easily manipulated through the framing of the image.  Here, a Cameroonian boy, perhaps 10 years old, is lying in the street, having had his feet and lower legs shot off apparently by Cameroon security forces, or perhaps one of the vigilante groups “serving” alongside national military contingents.

The boy was bleeding profusely as he grabbed at pieces of his shattered limbs, tossing them aside in agony as he no doubt realized they were no longer of use to him.  If he survived the trauma and the bleeding, if there was anyone there to bind the wounds and ease the pain, he would never do again what had come most naturally to him a short while earlier – to walk and run, to explore and participate in the street life of a community that now seems so diminished, so impotent in the face of the overwhelming reality of a young life on the brink, a life that now at its best is as shattered as the shards of his own limbs scattered across a familiar path.

This boy can never “kiss the ground” with the feet he no longer has.

I have seen thousands of similar images in the course of this work, some in person and more through the media platforms on which we are now, sad to say, increasingly dependent.  Like that tune you can’t stomach but also can’t forget, I have not been able to put this gruesome image out of my mind. This is a problem for many of in this work who imagine ourselves stronger and more emotionally resilient than we actually are. These images remind us of why we must stay engaged. But they also accumulate like toxins in our cells, akin to a poison we don’t realize we have ingested.

As many around the UN recognize, as attuned to US calendar rhythms as UN folks tend to be, this is our Thanksgiving week, a time both historically dubious and emotionally potent, a time when people now must make hard decisions about who to visit, how to travel, whether or not to accommodate the pandemic and lay low for just this once, just this year, in the hope that loved ones — especially our elderly — can survive our physical absence until the viral coast is truly clear.

It is also a week to contemplate the dual invitations implicit in this season; the invitation first to appreciation for the many blessings which we have received, the blessings which should constitute the core substance of our prayers however (and if ever) we understand them. Added to that is the invitation to giving, one which in normal times many would happily accept. But this year, those calls are often drowned out by a cacophony of grievances, uncertainty and loneliness; thus the invitation to give more of ourselves, more of the treasure we are now tempted to forget we have, more of the sensitive and intimate underbelly that is now mostly encased in thick layers of ideology and self-protection, all of this seems up for COVID-inspired grabs like rarely in our recent history.  

This is a time when the whole world seems to be messaging what we usually leave to our advertisers – that our lives are somehow less than they should be because we lack those core ties to “normal” patterns of consumption and connection that had defined our lives in what is becoming for many, a romanticized, pre-pandemic past.   In the void left by the sudden departure of that normal, we are collectively spending more and more time indulging our evidence-challenged assumptions about each other, acting out our anxieties by “tearing into each other,” and this for reasons we can no longer clearly explain, if indeed we ever could.  

Even for those of us who imagine ourselves in the “peace business” there is a fair bit of explaining to do.  We have tried our level-best in many instances, but our best “does not always answer” the questions and concerns which the world anxiously poses. To some degree, we seem to have achieved little more than putting disasters “on hold, “ a modest sign of success to be sure, but one which seems at times akin to ensuring a ready supply of umbrellas as a tornado approaches. 

In the institution of the UN where we routinely make our case for effective policy and the human values needed to sustain it, there often seems to be a fair amount of measuring success by putting looming disasters on hold, in part as a legitimate effort to buy time to see if a more sustainable solution to disaster threats can be negotiated and implemented, in part as what seems to be a not-always-subtle maneuver to kick problems down the road in the hope that another generation can rise above the consequences of their elder’s follies.

That said, there were some good and hopeful signs emanating from the UN this week, including a supportive, “fingers-crossed” Security Council Arria session on the peace process in Afghanistan; an adopted General Assembly resolution on a death-penalty moratorium that continues to gain traction and another GA session on reforming the Security Council; an event on how the medium of radio can both inflame atrocity crimes and promote social reconstruction; and a joint meeting of the Economic and Social Council and the Peacebuilding Commission that promises more coordinated responses to the diverse, “root causes” of armed conflict. In addition, although the UN does not insist on specific forms of governance from its member states, there was much timely and welcome scrutiny and active promotion of democracy this week with International IDEA at the controls.

Friday was also World Children’s Day, a time to reflect on the many promises made to our children which still remain elusive. Despite often herculean efforts by child advocates, children are leaving behind educational opportunity and re-entering a dangerous workforce across parts of Africa and Latin American due to the spread of the pandemic. Some children in Syria and Libya spend more time dodging bombs and landmines than balls on the playground. Children in places like Yemen are being deliberately starved to such a degree that their full functionality as adults will be severely impaired even if they mange to survive the current onslaught. Children are being displaced, then trafficked, then abused in the major cities of the so-called “civilized world.”

And then there is that image of the Cameroon boy that I simply cannot put out of my waking mind. His unimaginable misery does not in any way make me ‘’feel better” about my own life; if anything it encourages a toxic temptation to avert my gaze, to “talk about the weather” or other matters both banal and distracting. But I and others can surely recognize that as anxious as many of us are, as frayed around the edges as we now admit to being, the need to stay the course on policy attentiveness and practical concern remains acute. Thus my own Thanksgiving prayer this year is to appreciate others in larger measure, to offer more of what is left in me to give, and to hold on tight to my portion of our collective focus.

Tags: , , ,

Mess Halls: Curbing the Spread of our Current Chaos, Dr. Robert Zuber

15 Nov
Your Messy Room is Keeping You Unhealthy - Dr. Peggy Malone

Messes are made by people who want but don’t know what they want, let alone how to get it.  Joyce Carol Oates

There are more dishes to come, more flavors to try, and this time I will not spill or spit or drop or splash. Jay Rayner

We don’t have to wait for someone to make messes of our lives. We do a good enough job, ourselves.  Jodi Picoult

I’m shaken and I’m stirred.  Anthony Hamilton

You don’t know how much it is tiring to stay here, since Chaos is all I know. Mess is all I see; And noise is all I hear. Samiha Totanji

Like a button on a shirt buttoned wrong, every attempt to correct things led to yet another fine –not to say elegant– mess.  Haruki Murakami

Clean up your room!  Many Mothers

I spent some of my childhood sharing a bedroom with three younger brothers, a situation that was challenging both in terms of privacy and especially in terms of maintaining some semblance of fairness and order.

My mother, who had more children to care for than she needed and likely wanted, was constantly demanding that those of us responsible for turning that small room into a preview of Armageddon (mostly me) invested some of our life force in cleaning up the mess that was, as are so many messes in this world, so much easier to make than to repair.

The only blessing in this scenario was that there was a door to close, a way to keep the chaos of that room from spreading like a virus into unsuspecting corners of that small house.  But even inside the room itself, there were good reasons to restore some baseline of order, a baseline more likely to foster respect for the rights and feelings of other inhabitants, a baseline that allowed us to keep our toys and other belongings as “shared property” only when we chose to share them; not giving in to the chaos which enabled bullies like me to grab whatever they wanted over the squeals of disapproval from the other children. 

Needless to say, my mother had a different standard of cleanliness and “order” than her children did, and she struggled to get us to buy in to her standard without having to impose it through her own labor.   And people do, indeed, have sometimes wildly divergent levels of comfort around issues of order and cleanliness, as many in long-term relationships discover.  That said, there are lessons around “mess” that we would do well to consider, specifically the lesson that messes are more easily made than undone, and that the easiest way to clean up after ourselves is to resist the temptation to make a mess in the first instance.

I know that it is frustrating for some readers to endure these weekly attempts to analogize lessons from family life to civic life, from modest bedrooms to large conference rooms filled with important people ostensibly doing important things.   But let’s go there anyway.    For the world we now inhabit is surely characterized by one “mess” after another, many of which we could have seen coming if we were not so intent on averting our gaze; many of which have also given those of us in places of privilege an excuse to disregard the rights and needs of others, to grab more than our share of the metaphorical toys and stuffed animals, to get around to cleaning up after ourselves when it is convenient for us to do so and not when it is most urgent.

Unlike the chaos of my childhood resting space, for us in this larger world there is no door to close, no way to confine the consequences of the mess to the authors of the mess.  The chaos that we willingly tolerate for ourselves is also most often chaos exported, becoming yet another imposition on people who, in some instances at least, have their own issues with disorder and turmoil to resolve; people and communities whose messes are already challenging enough without additional external consequences from the discord which they neither caused nor can reasonably assimilate.

Those of you who read this weekly post and/or other (likely better) alternatives don’t need me to remind you about our currently over-heated mess threshold.   From a hyperactive pandemic to a conflict in Yemen that promises environmental ruin in the long term and starving children in the short term; from climate risks that have likely passed their tipping point to the growing numbers of displaced persons exchanging hopelessness at home for road-weary misery; from ocean creatures ingesting more plastic than prey to landscapes more prone to wildfires than wild flowers; the chaos that we have sown has deep roots and broad consequences, most of which inspire responses that are not as carefully crafted and boldly implemented as they should be, responses that seem to enable messes of longer-duration as often as they offer tangible improvement.

Even our democracies now seem in peril as more and more people worldwide seem to have abandoned the responsibility to push through the “messiness” of democratic consultation and consensus-building in favor of iron-like authoritarian voices telling them what they should want, what they should value and how they should go about getting what they have convinced themselves they are entitled to have.   Sadly, these are often the voices that justify their own mess-making at the expense of others, an entitlement to sow substantial short-term chaos secure in the belief that its consequences can be successfully exported as needed — that we can keep our own rooms reasonably in order in part by shipping messes off to the dwellings and communities of of others, largely against their will.

The UN which we engage relentlessly is a place at its best where nations and peoples can come together to assess and resolve common threats, to own the messes we have made and reverse the consequences we have largely ignored; and then together authorize and enact multilateral strategies to better ensure that there is less clutter and chaos on our planet, dampening down verbal excuses and political impediments preventing us from doing more to resolve the messes that perpetually beckon.

But at its worst, the UN is a place of inertia and obstruction, halls of policy where mostly privileged national lenses fuss over resolution and/or treaty language that guarantees (at best) tepid responses to our major messes, responses that are often not nearly as timely and robust as they need to be from an institution and its Assembly that are not yet as prescient, reliable and determined as we need them to be.

I am not naïve regarding the considerable value of a UN institution in which I (and my colleagues) have spent many long years. But the lessons that seemed clear to me when I first entered still apply. The longer we fail to acknowledge and respond to the messes that impact so much of our planet, the harder they are to resolve. And the less we are willing to control the consequential spread of our own chaos and disorder, the more mistrust and enmity we are likely to provoke in others.

My sense is that no amount of institutional self-referencing, no amount of speeches lofty or obstructionist in the General Assembly Hall or other multilateral settings should ever blind us to the degree to which the chaos, the mess, the “noise” of our world (including the cries of those whose lives are characterized by flying bombs, grave food insecurity and polluted waterways) have raised expectations for our policy. The world is crying out for new “dishes and flavors” to try, innovative solutions to threats and messes that have festered for much too long, fresh commitments from the most privileged that they will clean up their own spaces without off-loading the worst of their clutter on to spaces where it simply doesn’t belong.

Do we as a policy community have what it takes to make such a commitment? Are we willing to swallow some of the mistrust and downright orneriness that lead to sometimes bitter deliberations, such as was the case this week regarding a proposed e-voting procedure to allow the core work of the General Assembly to continue during a pandemic or other crisis? Are we willing to follow the trail of our own messes to ensure that our “solutions” don’t inadvertently create more discord, thereby impeding even more than is already the case the rights, development and stability of those we purport to help?

In my view (and hardly mine alone) a fair bit of what we in places of privilege and influence have wrought upon the world should shake us to our very core. But it should also stir a fresh passion in us, a passion to reverse our messy trajectories while we still can, to create more fairness and accountability within our institutional halls, to shut the door on the spread of our chaos of excess and indifference better than we are doing so far, chaos now firmly embedded in pandemics and armed conflicts, in climate shocks and social inequalities.

My mother knew little of such things. But she recognized a mess when she saw one, and she would likely recognize that we, too, have many messes still to acknowledge and confine within the spaces where we work and live.

Tags: , , ,

Race Track: Driving Discrimination from our Ranks, Dr. Robert Zuber

8 Nov
Social diversity is initially threatening but people do adapt over time – new research

The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for white, or women created for men. Alice Walker

We must dissent from the indifference. We must dissent from the apathy. We must dissent from the fear, the hatred and the mistrust.  Thurgood Marshall

My color is my joy and not my burden. Bebe Moore Campbell

Wherein is the cause for anger, envy or discrimination?  Mahatma Gandhi

But she knows where her ticket takes her. She will find her place in the sun. Tracy Chapman

The Black woman in the South who raises sons, grandsons and nephews had her heartstrings tied to a hanging noose.   Maya Angelou

Excessive praise arises from the same bigotry matrix as excessive criticism. Stefan Molyneux

It is a glorious November Sunday in New York, a day more like late September than the Sunday after a US presidential election.  I had vowed not to say much about the election results, though there is plenty to reflect on, plenty that elicits fair portions of both celebration and caution; with especially deep gratitude to the remarkable poll workers and vote tabulators who ignored and even at times defied a bevy of threats, including from the leadership of the US Postal Service, armed protestors and a spreading pandemic, to deliver what appears by all independent accounts to be free and fair voting for some 150 million US citizens.  

Despite this gift, we know that threats to this democracy, as to others worldwide, have not been laid to rest.  We know that there are tricks left to be played by those still in power (and those heaping “excessive praise” on them), people who understand full well the metaphorical knives that have been drawn by prosecutors and regulators once they leave the sanctuary of the White House.  Those of us who have been holding our breath (at times even our tongue) that this period of political – even criminal – hardball will soon pass recognize that democratic oxygen is still in short supply and that the grievances – legitimate and otherwise – that have driven us to an authoritarian brink are likely only to intensify over the next 10 weeks.

Assuming that a genuine political transition occurs in my country, and that is no foregone conclusion, we anticipate that (what we interpret as) benefits from a new US administration will accrue in the form of climate action and other multilateral efforts to curb the pandemic, reduce social and economic inequalities, disarm weapons and promote sustainable development.  The UN, which has largely refrained from criticism of the US (as it does routinely with all major state powers and funders), can expect a bit of a post-inaugural holiday as dues are paid in full and abandoned political commitments that can readily be reinstated will be.

This US election season also cast light on a UN agenda that is often-discussed but less-often implemented, and that is the concern for inclusion, the basic belief that all should have a say on matters which affect them; the belief that our increasingly inter-dependent world requires diverse voices on a wide range of matters both complex and mundane, including on matters of governance.  In  the US, our own myth of inclusivity has taken a pounding in recent years by those in positions of authority espousing equivalences between “whiteness” and “greatness.” This has resulted in some hard-to-remove stains on our national character including children separated from families and parents afraid to send their children to the grocery store for fear of confrontation with store managers or police; but also ordinary citizens having to fight through what appears to be willful disenfranchisement as polling places were closed, ballots arbitrarily rejected,  and voting lines in some “minority” neighborhoods permitted to stretch for miles.   

While grievances in my country now spring forth like weeds in an abandoned garden, there are some that have deeper roots, louder echoes of oppression, producing more pervasive anxieties.  There is much listening we need to do far beyond our comfort zones, ideological bubbles, evidence-less presumptions and political preferences.  And a special listening post must be dedicated to those whose “ticket” has yet to guarantee them a seat on most every ride, the mothers and grandmothers whose heartstrings are “tied to a hanging noose,” those who live under threat every day that their next venture outdoors will trigger some hate-filled response or even a one-way trip across the nearest border.  

The UN in its own way has tried to keep alive the flickering flame of inclusiveness, insisting with varying levels of success that we find the courage and the means to ensure that those habitually left behind are invited to the head table; that their “ticket” to viability and safety is deemed as valid as any other’s; that their full franchise is both encouraged and protected; that the fruits of development (or a COVID vaccine) are distributed without politics or prejudice; and that the justifications we employ regarding the “causes” of our discriminatory ways are recognized to be largely without merit.

This past week there were several key events (mostly virtual) at the UN that underscored the ever-deepening relationship between inclusiveness and the promotion of peaceful societies. In the Security Council, in the General Assembly, and during events celebrating the increasingly gendered commitments of UN policing and highlighting efforts to abolish capital punishment, the mantra of inclusiveness and an end to discriminatory practices — as well as the incitement which stokes racism, xenophobia and other human behavior we could better live without — were duly reinforced.

Among the primary takeaways from this long and exhausting week included Malaysia’s lament in the General Assembly’s 3rd Committee that the COVID pandemic “has brought out the worst in us,” specifically with regard to racial and religious discrimination. And in a Security Council discussion on “drivers of conflict, Sir Hilary Beckles underscored the tangible steps needed to reinforce this current “age of apology,” while the Prime Minister of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines reminded delegations that we cannot hope to overcome chasms of distrust and apathy unless we can speed up our current “baby steps”

There was even more of value to digest including UN Special Rapporteur Day’s plea to address and eliminate the “habituation” in many societies that allows people to tolerate discrimination, Mexico’s call for higher levels of government consultation and trust-building with the most vulnerable and marginalized within national borders, and the Netherlands urging of UN member states to be better “truth-tellers” on racial justice.

While one could surely chide the UN for its own “baby steps” regarding its long-delayed success in gender-balancing peace operations and other core security-sector functions, the UN also enables valuable guidance on how hold together a global community which has too often threatened to disengage from one another. Keys to the reconciliation we need include broader-based consultations, higher levels of truth telling and truth-hearing, firmer commitments to address the scourge of incitement in public and online settings, and better protection of spaces where “public goods” (such as a potential COVID vaccine) take precedence over private interests.

But will we listen? The US president-elect’s oft-repeated claim to represent all US citizens — “those who voted for me and those who didn’t” — is a welcome if somewhat conventional claim, albeit with challenges destined to frustrate all but the most sincere and robust of -commitments. We have, regrettably, conspired over many years to create a culture that is long on acrimony and short on listening; long on grievances and conspiracies and short on evidence and compassion; long on self-delusion and short on self-reflection. We are less mindful than it is in our best interest to be, both about the demonizing we do routinely within our own borders, and the violence we inflict — directly or by proxy — beyond them. We simply cannot survive much more of this no matter who occupies the White House.

I want to end on a more hopeful note by referencing last night’s speech by vice-president-elect Kamala Harris. She delivered a strong and humane point of contact with women and men across my country (and likely beyond) for whom “color” has been a burden; a burden for those who have suffered much, often over many generations, but also a burden for those who can see no way out of their own predicaments other than through more threats, more intolerance, more dubious claims of “superiority.”

For Ms. Harris, her own burden seemed, for a glorious moment at least, to have become something more akin to a joy. As she proclaimed with great enthusiasm, “I am the first, but I will not be the last.” She has found her well-deserved place in the sun, but she also recognizes that if that same sun is somehow prevented from shining on all, the ones we like and the ones we don’t, the ones we trust and the ones we don’t, then the democratic values and processes we presume to cherish will eventually and finally slip through our grasp.

Clearly we need more “firsts” in our country and our world, “firsts” emanating from every corner of human community, especially where people are feeling neglected or abandoned, disrespected or humiliated. And as Ms. Harris rightly suggested, we need more “seconds” and “thirds” as well.

Tags: , , , ,

Thought-Provoked: The Mindset We Need Now, Dr. Robert Zuber

1 Nov
Image preview

Learn why the world wags and what wags it. T.H. White

The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled.  Plutarch

Curiosity is, in great and generous minds, the first passion and the last.  Samuel Johnson

I think, at a child’s birth, if a mother could ask a fairy godmother to endow it with the most useful gift, that gift would be curiosity. Eleanor Roosevelt

Her grandmother had once told her that one of life’s best lessons was not being afraid to look foolish. Melissa Senate

Do stuff. Be clenched, curious. Not waiting for inspiration’s shove or society’s kiss on your forehead.  Susan Sontag

Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.  Carl Sagan

Although it may seem premature to some, one of the tasks as the gut-wrenching US elections approach is to think about their aftermath and what we as a people need to do – need to become – in order for elections to do anything more than widen social divisions and confirm biases that it would be better to challenge.

 As is the case in most instances, and as I mentioned last week, elections in and of themselves rarely resolve national problems. Tuesday in the US may result in a bevy of new faces at the head of the table, but there is no guarantee that those faces will be able to “sell” disenfranchised or ignored segments of the population that government truly has their back.  And our elections, in and of themselves, certainly don’t guarantee that the US as an entity can restore its role as partner to those seeking a higher level of accountability from their own governments; or that we can once again pledge to become a reliable bearer of our own creeds and commitments.

The US is by no stretch the source of all problems in the world, but we must acknowledge our bad habits of thought and action, some of which have punctuated our 200 + year history while others have recently been added to the national menu.  There is no reason to dwell here on our cruel legacies of race or the delusions associated with our alleged “exceptionalism,” except to say that we must continue to interrogate and even “wrestle” with these demons if we are ever to bring them to heel. 

But beyond these, there is still something that seems deeply wrong with us – all of us, not just the ones who see fellow-citizens as enemies; not just the ones who pull cookies from a jar that isn’t theirs; not just the ones who vacuum up public wealth and horde it within privately-controlled accounts; not just the ones who are more concerned about the operation of their guns than the health and well-being of their neighbors.  Collectively speaking, we don’t listen well to others, we wilfully contain our concerns within our families and other “safe havens,” we are much too comfortable with what we imagine we “know” and much too sensitive and protective regarding any threats we perceive to what are so-often lazy, distracted and self-referential opinions.

In sum, we have become willfully incurious about others, about our planet, about the wonders, many still largely unexamined, that exist below our surfaces and beyond our orbits.  We are too keen to project our biases hither and yon, but not to ask the questions that allow others to share, and also to grow, and to invite such questions in return.  We “know” so much, apparently, about all sorts of things, including what our political adversaries are thinking and feeling, what they fear and hope for, what impediments, real and imagined, block the path of their fulfillment. 

Except we don’t.

In our post-election period, regardless of outcomes, we must find ways to recover our collective curiosity about our world and each other, a thirst for what there is to be known beyond what we claim to know, the larger realities and wonders that exist beyond the opinions and biases we barely comprehend and rarely interrogate, but relentlessly project and defend.

In this time of opinions both aggressive and shallow, a time when science is little understood but widely attacked, the ongoing efforts of scientists to examine, recommend and re-examine on urgent matters such as climate change, pandemics and environmental degradation are held up to ridicule and accused of being unreliable and even corrupted, often by people determined to project their own corruption on to others.

In this regard, there were some interesting rays of hope at the UN this week, including a small “Open Science” event on Thursday that shed some good light on our limited understanding of how science works, the curiosity that lies at its roots, and the “public” benefits that can accrue from its investigations.  At this event, the directors of UNESCO, the World Health Organization and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights joined forces to remind diplomats – and the rest of us – why science at its best matters so much to the lives we lead and the world we need. 

All speakers urged a less “secretive,” more open, transparent and community-engaged scientific community, one prepared to insist on a more democratic distribution of scientific benefits, including on a possible COVID vaccine.  Such “honest engagements” as High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet urged, must involve discussions of how science aspires to its best insights; the consulting and accommodating of evidence at all stages of investigation, doubling back on conclusions and findings, continuing to modify and enrich what might otherwise devolve into an artificially-inflexible consensus.  It must also be about communicating its “best sense of things” beyond the laboratories and research centers, helping us to see as clearly as possible what needs to be fixed, including in ourselves, and how such might effectively be accomplished.  It must be about asking the next question rather than settling for the last answer. And it must be about, as UNESCO DG Audrey Azoulay noted, learning to share research and its benefits better across borders as well to to cultivate the “collective intelligence” that we will need to tap into more regularly –beyond the confines of our laboratories and government offices, beyond the bearers of advanced degrees and owners of large bank holdings — if the problems that will continue to confront us post-election have any good chance of being solved.

Indeed, it is that precisely that “intelligence” from multiple sources and corners of our societies — intelligence that is generous, attentive, evidence-based, inclusive and courageous — which we must learn to tap in larger measure if we are to patch up this leaking ship.  As we plot our course forward with the leadership that we in the US will give ourselves on Tuesday, we will need heavy doses of all of these attributes, and then some, if the social ruptures, stereotyping and current levels of distrust are to be effectively combated; indeed if we are to emerge as a nation in more than name only. To this end, we would do well to cease our collective suppression of the “fire” of curiosity, curb our obsessive need for certainty, and invest more of ourselves in what “wags” this world still filled with incredible things to be known and which we are slowly, foolishly, dangerously bringing to its metaphorical knees.

As grateful as I was for the “Open Science” discussion, some of the most inspirational moments at the UN this week actually came from other, if complementary spaces.  At a UN-Habitat “World Cities Day” event, for instance, a youth climate activist called for higher levels of “responsible action” on climate change and reminded delegates that hers’ may well be the “last generation that can bring us back from the abyss.”  And in the Security Council, the ever-thoughtful Ambassador Singer from the Dominican Republic noted that, even after a decade of horrific, unprecedented conflict in Syria, the refugees and doctors, the prisoners and economically distressed have not given up; and “neither must we.”

And neither will we.

For the sake of the young activists now begging the rest of us to to “consult the science” on climate change, the civilians in war-ravaged regions desperate for provisions and the silencing of guns, the front-line health workers seeking guidance on how best to restore the health of COVID patients and reinforce often-ignored health guidelines, we must persevere. Tuesday’s elections may give those of us in the US (and perhaps others as well) the chance to reboot our cognitive skills and priorities and reset our ethics and relationships. If so, it’s a chance we simply must seize.

Birth Mark: Reminding Ourselves Why We’re Here, Dr. Robert Zuber

25 Oct
See related image detail

The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why.   Mark Twain

Ask him to tell you about when he was born. What you get won’t be the truth: it will be a story. And nothing is more telling than a story.  Diane Setterfield

My mother groaned, my father wept, into the dangerous world I leapt.  William Blake

A birth-date is a reminder to celebrate the life as well as to update the life.  Amit Kalantri

Lowly seeds are nourished in the earth, and then later the ravishing blooms appear. Moderata Fonte

The dream crossed twilight between birth and dying.  T.S. Eliot

You were born with a broken heart.  From the cracks of it love oozes out.  Lidia Longorio

This weekend represents, for me at least, the annual ritual associated with the closely aligned birthdays of the United Nations (important) and my own (not particularly important). 

This is not a “major” birthday for me, but it certainly is for the UN, marking 75 years of existence and generating strong and diverse assessments from those across a wide spectrum – those who stress the indispensability of the UN to global peace and progress and those who feel disheartened that an institution birthed in great promise and even love from the “broken heart” of a devastating world war could have squandered portions of that potential to the political machinations of its member states.

Indeed, these and other assessments are understandable.  The UN often comes across very often as a stodgy and predictable bureaucracy with member states calling the shots and represented by diplomats whose main task, it sometimes seems, is to put the actions of their own countries in the best possible light, even when that light is dim at best.   The UN is also brimming with NGOs, a number with large brands and budgets, that often pursue single-issue agendas and struggle endlessly over resolution language that governments are mostly free to accept or ignore as they see fit.  Moreover, regarding the core issue on which most people assess the UN – peace and security – the UN’s Security Council is often mired in political in-fighting that impedes its ability to prevent or resolve fighting elsewhere.

On the other hand, the UN is the place where a wide array of pressing concerns are raised for potential resolution in multilateral spaces; indeed the only “spaces” where such resolution is often feasible. Even while national interests temper levels of global urgency that many of these issues demand, that so many pieces to a more peaceful and sustainable world find meaningful expression in UN conference rooms and (now) online forums is a tribute to the norm-building across borders and regions for which the UN seems uniquely suited, even if circumstances on the ground don’t always shift sufficiently in response.

Given this, it turned out to be quite a good birthday week for the UN, with some hopeful progress on peacebuilding highlighted in Central African Republic and Abyei and with a variety of important discussions taking place across all six General Assembly committees.  Of particular interest to us were discussions focused on protecting free speech for academics and other citizens; on burdens to nations and communities arising from excessive external debt; on the status of minority groups  scapegoated for the spread of COVID and its economic consequences; on preserving the dignity and rights of persons displaced from their homes due to climate change and armed violence; and on the struggle to create safer spaces for journalists and civil society advocates seeking to report on and put a stop to war and human rights abuses.

There was much more this week where this came from, underscoring the UN’s role as a place where key issues and themes – virtually all with implications for international peace and security — can get at least some of the policy attention they deserve and, in the most successful instances, actually shift circumstances in families and communities for the better. 

Also in this 75th birthday week, the UN was able to announce two major breakthroughs, a cease fire agreement to pave the way for reconciliation and reconstruction in Libya and the entry into force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.  Both admittedly have long hills to climb before full sovereignty and sustainable peace is obtained for Libya, and before the nuclear weapons powers (not signatories to the treaty) agree to renounce their weapons rather than modernize them. And yet both bring hope and even inspiration to the global table, and both are testament to the UN’s increasing determination and skill in mediation, to the larger policy role being exercised by small island and other small states on issues from climate to nuclear weapons, and to the determination of NGOs long-seeking a pathway out of dangerous impasse that has for too long kept these weapons at the core of national security doctrines.

And so it goes for the UN whose trajectory is not so much unlike our individual ones – potential achieved and denied; promises kept and abandoned; changes to habits of work welcomed and resisted, truths about what can and cannot be accomplished shared and hidden.   For the UN there is much to celebrate but also to confess, to fix, certainly to “update.”  In that “twilight” in which the UN continues to bask, we must acknowledge that while we might not have evolved so much as a species, the world has shifted dramatically since the UN’s birthing.  And these shifts are now more rapid, more ominous, more complex. The UN’s relevance going forward  is thus related to how we mange those shifts; how skillful, urgent and inclusive our responses to current threats and challenges can become; and how resolved  we are to keep from “kicking the can down the road” for younger generations to deal with.

As individuals, as members of families and communities, as diplomats and policy wonks, we exist in our own twilight, between birth and death, between relevance and obscurity, between promise and fulfillment.  And for people like me who tend to celebrate too little and ponder too much, the “mark” of our birth lies in continually ascertaining why we are here, what our purpose is, what we most need to do, share and inspire before our own lights are finally extinguished.

This is a specific kind of “updating” which can be as relevant to the institutions we work with as it is for ourselves.  What is calling us to urgent action now?  How do we ensure that all our skills, wisdom and experiences remain in play?   Who do we need to reach – and reassure – that everything that can be done to uphold rights and improve circumstances is being done, that risks are willing to be taken to ensure that promises remain binding, that the most hopeful of our dreams are truly becoming incarnate, and that we refuse ourselves the luxury (even arrogance) of taking credit for resolving problems that didn’t need to occur in the first place?

In a world of threats such as climate change and biodiversity loss that are recognized but not yet remedied; of a spreading pandemic and the deaths, distrust and destroyed livelihoods it leaves in its wake; of political agreements and resolutions signed and then ploddingly implemented; of weapons banned but not renounced by those who hold them; none of us can say with certainty where this current iteration of human progress and folly is headed.  What we can say with some certainty is that the future will require us to break free from some of the habits and their justifications that keep us in the mode of chasing after crises rather than minimizing risks, of hiding our light behind our bureaucracies and their mandates, of consulting the same voices and expertise over and over rather than considering fresher (if not necessarily better) alternatives.  

As part of my own “updating,” I plan to spend some of this birthday and beyond looking intently for those “lowly seeds,” those voices and potentials largely unheeded, those stories of birth and inspiration largely ignored; those who actually have potential to generate the “ravishing blooms” which we have almost forgotten can exist at all, let alone exist for all.  If the UN is to turn its own 75th birthday into conditions for many returns (and we genuinely root for that outcome), it must better honor its own capacity to nourish inclusion, not only with regard to the issues and crises to be resolved, but with regard to the full range of persons with their own “birth marks” who are able and eager to contribute.

← Older Entries
Newer Entries →